The Prophet Muhammad: Mercy for Creations

وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِّلْعَالَمِينَ

اے محمدؐ، ہم نے جو تم کو بھیجا ہے تو یہ دراصل دنیا والوں کے حق میں ہماری رحمت ہے

We sent thee not, but as a Mercy for all creatures[Quran;21:106]

إِنَّ اللَّـهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ ۚ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا

اللہ اور اس کے ملائکہ نبیؐ پر درود بھیجتے ہیں، اے لوگو جو ایمان لائے ہو، تم بھی ان پر درود و سلام بھیجو

"Verily, God and His angels bless the Prophet: [hence,] O you who have attained to faith, bless him and give yourselves up [to his guidance] in utter self-surrender!" [Qura'n;33:56]

Allah's Messenger was the kindest of men in the same way as he excelled all others in courage and valour. Being extremely kind-hearted, his eyes brimmed with tears at the slightest sign of inhumanity. A Companion, 'Shaddaad bin 'Aws' reported the Apostle as saying: "Allah has commanded you to show kindness to everyone, so if you have to kill, kill in a good manner, and if you slaughter an animal, slaughter it gently. If anyone of you has to slay an animal, he should sharpen the blade first and treat the animal well." Continue reading >>>>>

Rebutal: Anti Islam Video from USA

On the pretext of freedom of speech USA and West allows the extremists to insult Islam, Quran and Prophet Muhammad [peace be upon him]. They are well aware that this will hurt the feelings of 1.5 billion Muslims, the world over who can not bear any non sense on the pretext of freedom of speech. On the other side In … Continue reading »

Ignorance is Curse

“.. Are the knowledgeable and the ignorant equal? In fact, none will take heed except the people of understanding.”(Qur’an;39:9).

Ignorance is the curse which leads to darkness and destruction. This was realised by Plato, 2400 years ago. ‘The ‘Allegory of the Cave’, also known as ‘The Cave Analogy‘, ‘Plato’s Cave’ or the ‘Parable of the Cave’, is an allegory used by the Greek philosopher Plato in his work The Republic to illustrate “our nature in its education and want of education”.  The Allegory of the Cave is presented after themetaphor of the sun and the analogy of the divided line . Socrates describes a group of people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all of their lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected on the wall by things passing in front of a fire behind them, and begin to ascribe forms to these shadows. According to Socrates, the shadows are as close as the prisoners get to viewing reality. He then explains how the philosopher is like a prisoner who is freed from the cave and comes to understand that the shadows on the wall are not constitutive of reality at all, as he can perceive the true form of reality rather than the mere shadows seen by the prisoners.

This is illustrated in following videos:

Brief

Socrates begins by describing a scenario in which what people take to be real would in fact be an illusion. He asks Glaucon to imagine acave inhabited by prisoners who have been chained and held immobile since childhood: not only are their arms and legs held in place, but their heads are also fixed, compelled to gaze at a wall in front of them. Behind the prisoners is an enormous fire, and between the fire and the prisoners is a raised walkway, along which people walk carrying things on their heads “including figures of men and animals made of wood, stone and other materials”. The prisoners watch the shadows cast by the men, not knowing they are shadows. There are also echoes off the wall from the noise produced from the walkway.

Socrates suggests the prisoners would take the shadows to be real things and the echoes to be real sounds, not just reflections of reality, since they are all they had ever seen or heard. They would praise as clever whoever could best guess which shadow would come next, as someone who understood the nature of the world, and the whole of their society would depend on the shadows on the wall.

Release from the cave: Socrates next introduces something new to this scenario. Suppose that a prisoner is freed and permitted to stand up. If someone were to show him the things that had cast the shadows, he would not recognize them for what they were and could not name them; he would believe the shadows on the wall to be more real than what he sees. “Suppose further,” Socrates says, “that the man was compelled to look at the fire: wouldn’t he be struck blind and try to turn his gaze back toward the shadows, as toward what he can see clearly and hold to be real? What if someone forcibly dragged such a man upward, out of the cave: wouldn’t the man be angry at the one doing this to him? And if dragged all the way out into the sunlight, wouldn’t he be distressed and unable to see “even one of the things now said to be true,” viz. the shadows on the wall?

After some time on the surface, however, Socrates suggests that the freed prisoner would acclimate. He would see more and more things around him, until he could look upon the Sun. He would understand that the Sun is the “source of the seasons and the years, and is the steward of all things in the visible place, and is in a certain way the cause of all those things he and his companions had been seeing”.

Return to the cave:Socrates next asks Glaucon to consider the condition of  this man. “Wouldn’t he remember his first home, what passed for wisdom there, and his fellow prisoners, and consider himself happy and them pitiable? And wouldn’t he disdain whatever honors, praises, and prizes were awarded there to the ones who guessed best which shadows followed which? Moreover, were he to return there, wouldn’t he be rather bad at their game, no longer being accustomed to the darkness? “Wouldn’t it be said of him that he went up and came back with his eyes corrupted, and that it’s not even worth trying to go up? And if they were somehow able to get their hands on and kill the man who attempts to release and lead up, wouldn’t they kill him?”

Remarks on the allegory: Socrates remarks that this allegory can be taken with what was said before, viz. the metaphor of the Sun, and the divided line. In particular, he likens

“the region revealed through sight” – the ordinary objects we see around us – “to the prison home, and the light of the fire in it to the power of the Sun. And in applying the going up and the seeing of what’s above to the soul’s journey to the intelligible place, you not mistake my expectation, since you desire to hear it. A god doubtless knows if it happens to be true. At all events, this is the way the phenomena look to me: in the region of the knowable the last thing to be seen, and that with considerable effort, is the idea of good; but once seen, it must be concluded that this is indeed the cause for all things of all that is right and beautiful – in the visible realm it gives birth to light and its sovereign; in the intelligible realm, itself sovereign, it provided truth and intelligence – and that the man who is going to act prudently in private or in public must see it”.

After “returning from divine contemplations to human evils”, a man “is graceless and looks quite ridiculous when – with his sight still dim and before he has gotten sufficiently accustomed to the surrounding darkness – he is compelled in courtrooms or elsewhere to contend about the shadows of justice or the representations of which they are the shadows, and to dispute about the way these things are understood by men who have never seen justice itself?” [Courtesy/Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato's_Cave]

Conclusion:

God loves His creation, He has been selecting prophets among the ignorant people for their guidance. He enlightened the prophets with the light of His knowledge. Some are Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ  and Muhammad [peace be upon them all]. Some people listened to them while others mocked them,  even  tried to kill some prophets. Some people followed the prophets, but the scholars responsible for it,  altered the message after prophets were gone. Finally God delivered His final message, Qura'n through last prophet, God took responsibility upon Himself for its protection. Its a matter of choice for humanity to remain ignorant, live in the darkness like ‘prisoners of the cave’ or listen and follow the last message of guidance for salvation, still available in original revealed form! Unfortunately some Muslims ignore the clear instructions of Qura'n, kill innocent people called Takfiri Taliban, they need to study Qura'n to comprehend the message clearly. The triliteral root ʿayn lām mīm (ع ل م) occurs 854 times in the Quran, in 14 derived forms, if exclude 73 times as the noun ʿālamīn (عَٰلَمِين) for World/Worlds, at remaining 781 places it is used in the meanings of  'Knowledge Know, teach, taught, learn & for God as 'All Knower, All Knowing'.

Read More:

1. Learning & Science
2. http://quran-pedia.blogspot.com
3.  Universe, Science & God
4.  Faith & Reason
5. Humanism or Atheism
6. Islam & Philosophy
7. Metaphysics: Al-Ghaib

New Fitnah- Anti Islam Film

On the pretext of freedom of speech USA and West allows the extremists to insult Islam, Quran and Prophet Muhammad [peace be upon him]. They are well aware that this will hurt the feelings of 1.5 billion Muslims, the world over who can not bear any non sense on the pretext of freedom of speech. On the other side In … Continue reading » 

ناراضی ظاہر کرنے کا ایک طریقہ ملائیشیا میں سولہ غیر سرکاری تنظیموں نے اختیار کیا۔ انہوں نے اپنے بیس نمائندے بھیج کر امریکی سفارت خانے کو ایک میمورینڈم دیا، پیغام ان کا بھی یہ ہی تھا کہ انہیں اسلام کی توہین قبول نہیں ہے، بس انداز ذرا مختلف تھا اس لیے کوئی جانی یا مالی نقصان نہیں ہوا

http://dunya.com.pk/?key=VjFjeE1HTXhTbGRSYkZaVFZrWmFURmxzVlRGaU1YQkdXa1prVkdKRmNFWlVWbVIzWVZVeGRWb3phRnBpUlRWb1dWY3hTMUl3T1ZsUmJVWlRVa1ZKTUZaRVJsTlNNWEJ5VDFWV2FFMHlhRkJXYTJScVpERlNkR05HV210V01Gb3hWVmN3TUZCUlBUMD0=

Sallafis, Takfiris, CIA and RAW Joined Hands

Takfiris & Sallafis are rather recently emerged sects, originating from Saudi Arabia and said to be an "improvement" over the well known Wahhabi. Both of these two sects want to ensure that every Muslim must go to Heaven, as they claim to be Muslims, themselves. However, the method of ensuring is somewhat rough and unique to themselves and not what the Islam teaches. They both want, firstly all Muslims to start thinking, living, behaving in a way they preach, demand, not necessarily follow; and secondly, to quickly despatch those who do not fit in their perception of being Muslims to the next world. Method of despatch is usually slaughter to strike terror in the hearts of all. 

Sallafis are trying to kill every Shia, not only in Pakistan but also in Afghanistan as they consider them 'non-believers'. Takfiris also believe that all Muslims not fitting their own description of being a Muslim must be despatched to the next world. The master mind of Parade Lane's attack on the mosque in Rawalpindi, where from children to elderly were praying to Allah, was asked if he had any remorse of killing people at Juma Prayers, including children. His answer was, sending "munafiqeen" to death was the right thing to do, earlier the better. He had no regrets.*

Ahsan, spokesperson of TTP has told journalists that the Tehrik was not interested in US leaving Afghanistan, or Pak Army's operations or otherwise; it only wants enforcement of Sharia in Pakistan, by them. Shariah of their perceptions. Any disagreement will be met with death to the  dissenting or non-complying men, women, children, all.
Those who talk of "negotiating with TTP" are taking the nature of TTP in consideration. Taliban, are not simple Pashtuns, following age old Pashtunwali.They are nowhere near Pashtunwali.

This group, or for that matter all militants, insurgents and active supporters of militancy/extremism in the name of Islam are gone past the stage of negotiating. TTP has been very cleverly high jacked by CIA and RAW handlers. That is clearly betrayed by the selection of targets, types of munition, supply of most modern and expensive force multipliers that they employ for sabotage and terrorism. 

All military actions ( or terror actions as they fall in the category of violence and thus are indeed military actions) are meant to create effects. The smaller effects limited in Time and Space are called Tactical, major effects are called Operational and the effects which can influence the capability of war waging are called Strategic Effects. The TTP has been

trying to create strategic effects by their attacks. Who is so qualified to pick up their targets, timings, night vision devices, satellite pictures and a range of multiple weapons suited for creating strategic effects? Who procures and pays-for this very expensive and not available off-the-shelf military hardware?The Mullahs? These are professionals from RAW and CIA with some hand of Mossad also. US and Indian tax-payers are the ultimate paymasters.

Now in this scenario, Imran Khan wants to visit NW! He has some well known attributes;  known to be a liberal, honest patriot, a ray of hope for most Pakistanis who are fed up with the two known parties and their coalition partners. He personifies a breath of fresh air for Pakistanis. However, Imran Khan also qualifies even from Sallafi/Takfiris perspective, but not as a prospective future leader, but as a target to be killed. 

Then there are enemies of Pakistan, who have been trying their best to foment insurgency in Balochistan and FATA,  killing Chinese engineers working on projects in Pakistan, all with a view to destabilise and isolate Pakistan to achieve their strategic objectives. Would they let a new leader emerge who sounds sincere to Pakistan and is audacious enough to stand up to the bullies? They will ensure that through the TTP Imran Khan is killed. Did't they get Benazir killed?*

Imran Khan can be accompanied by a million people, but against suicide bombing and IEDs the defences start crumbling. A succession of determined suicide bombers WILL reach the target.

Will someone council Imran Khan, please?*